Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Jolivette v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Paul Patrick Jolivette, Jr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Rick Hill, T. Verras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Arita v. Leonard Hollins, et al
as 12-31167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE N. ARITA
Defendant - Appellee:
LEONARD HOLLINS, Sergeant, T. BUTLER, Major, MIKE UNKNOWN, E.M.T. and others
CURRY v. LOGAN
as 4:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WARDELL CURRY
Defendant:
J LOGAN, T THOMAS, T BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CO. et al
as 1:2012cv00437
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. BUTLER
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CO., JAKE ZIELDER, LAWRENCE PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arita v. Hollins et al
as 3:2011cv00850
Plaintiff:
Theodore Arita
Defendant:
T. Butler, Leonard Hollins, Unknown Stroud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Crosby v. Bing Crosby, et al
as 11-31187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
BING CROSBY, MARY CROSBY, MONTY FORBESS and others
Butler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv02802
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Butler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Senator v. Cates et al
as 2:2011cv02029
Plaintiff:
Bruce Senator
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, Robin Dezember, D. Foston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., ET AL.
as 2:2011cv67121
Plaintiff:
COLUMBUS T BUTLER and DOROTHY H BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosby v. Crosby et al
as 3:2011cv00372
Defendant:
T. Butler, Bing Crosby, Mary Crosby and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
