Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Luis Harris v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 14-15520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFERY T. BEASLEY, Chief Inspector General FDOC, WARDEN and others
Laster v. Officer A. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv24067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Laster
Defendant:
A. Lee, Jeffrey T Beasley and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASEY v. CREWS et al
as 3:2013cv00461
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS and JEFFERY T BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. CREWS et al
as 5:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, JEFFERY T BEASLEY, CHRIS LANDRUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Crews et al
as 3:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Luis Munuzuri Harris
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Jeffrey T. Beasley, Chris Landrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Beasley et al
as 1:2013cv21244
Plaintiff:
Samuel Banks
Defendant:
Jeffery T. Beasley, Cummings, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv04629
Plaintiff:
Kelly T. Beasley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pedro Grant v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 13-10889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO JOSE GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH S. TUCKER, Sec Doc, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, JEFFERY T. BEASLEY, Insp General and others
Girard v. Rockhill et al
as 8:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Laura Girard
Defendant:
Craig Rockhill, Corliss Cambell, William Burgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. TUCKER et al
as 5:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
PEDRO JOSE GRANT
Defendant:
KENNETH S TUCKER, RICK SCOTT, JEFFERY T BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
