Cases 1 - 7 of 7
T.L. v. SOUTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
T. L.
Defendant:
SOUTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Morales v. Hufford et al
as 3:2010cv02331
Petitioner:
Waldemar Morales
Respondent:
T. L. Hufford and U. S. Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIMBS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77434
Plaintiff:
T. L. MIMBS, JR. and T. L. MIMBS, JR.
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sutton v. Bradley et al
as 1:2007cv01798
Plaintiff:
Eugene Sutton
Defendant:
E. Bradley, Hokeman - S.I.A., Troy Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AXION POWER BATTERY MANUFACTURING, INC. v. T&L SALES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
AXION POWER BATTERY MANUFACTURING, INC., AXION POWER BATTERY MANUFACTURING, INC., AXION POWER BATTERY MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Defendant:
T&L SALES, INC., T&L SALES, INC., BATTERYXPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
JOHNSON et al v. EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62117
Plaintiff:
CECIL C. JOHNSON, CECIL C. JOHNSON, CECIL C. JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
