Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Robinson v. T Mobile et al
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
T Mobile, T Deutsche US Inc, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Cox Cable LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Cox Cable LLC and Metro by T. Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Metro by T. Mobile et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Metro by T. Mobile and Cox Cable
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00503
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Touch Tel Communication, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Touch Tel Communication, Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. d/b/a T-Mobile and Sprint Solutions, Inc. d/b/a T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Simply Wireless, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00597
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Simply Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wilson v. T-Mobile USA Corporation / Metro PCS Incorporated
as 3:2020cv00014
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Corporation / Metro PCS Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
