Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Al-Ali v. The Church of Jesus Christ, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4102
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, MURRAY CITY and others
Claimant: BRET JOHNSON, court administrator
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIHAD AL-ALI
Al-Ali v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The et al
as 2:2018cv00845
Defendant: Sean Reyes, Third District Court of Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff: Jihad Al-Ali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Savage et al v. Magruder et al
as 2:2016cv01033
Plaintiff: Aaron Savage and D'Andre Williams
Defendant: Nick Magruder, Bob Filar, Jeff McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pyles v. Butler et al
as 1:2015cv10793
Petitioner: Christopher T. Pyles
Respondent: Kimberly Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John McQueen v. T. Pyles, et al
as 12-4485
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN W. MCQUEEN
Defendant - Appellee: T. PYLES and R. WAUGH
Mc Queen v. Pyles We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00166
Plaintiff: John W Mc Queen
Defendant: T Pyles and R Waugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Pyle et al
as 5:2011cv03612
Plaintiff: James Ratliff
Defendant: T Pyle, Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Movant: Crawford S. McGivaren, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pyles v. Rednour et al
as 1:2010cv05023
Petitioner: Christopher T. Pyles
Respondent: Dave Rednour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pyles v. Gaetz et al
as 1:2009cv07614
Petitioner: Christopher T. Pyles
Respondent: Donald Gaetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole et al v. Pyle et al
as 6:2009cv01107
Plaintiff: Scott E. Cole and Michelle L. Cole
Defendant: John T. Pyle, II, E. Tom Pyle, Jr., William E. Pyle and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?