Cases 1 - 10 of 47
HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv02649
Plaintiff:
HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, Aacting commissioner TROY A MILLER, PORT DIRECTOR TENEVAL T THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305 Custom Duties:0Forfeiture-Immoral Articles
Morgan v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ann L. MacDougall, Craig Collard and others
Omar Folk v. BOP, et al
as 22-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Employee's and Medical Staff and DAVID J. BALL
Defendant:
T. ANDRESS, JOHN T. BURN, C. CAIN and others
HOPKINS v. FERRO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv03775
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
FERRO CORPORATION, PETER T THOMAS, DAVID A LORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. FERRO CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv13750
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
FERRO CORPORATION, PETER T. THOMAS, DAVID A. LORBER and others
WHITFIELD v. FERRO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv13750
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
FERRO CORPORATION, PETER T. THOMAS, DAVID A. LORBER and others
Omar Folk v. BOP, et al
as 21-1543
Defendant / Appellee:
A. RODERMEL, NICK MAIZE, T. THOMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Christopher Thomas v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 21-1069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER T. THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI
THOMAS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 1:2020cv02454
Defendant:
Karen Merritt-Scully, Sargeant Burns, Warden John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2020cv05843
Defendant:
KAREN MERRITT-SCULLY, THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
