Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Hills
as 23-30612
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Brien T. Hills
Arnone v. County of Dallas
as 21-10597
Defendant / Appellee:
William T. Hill, Jr., in his Individual capacity, County of Dallas County, Texas and Ron Goethals, in his Individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher George Arnone
Arnone v. Syed et al
as 3:2017cv03027
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Arnone
Defendant:
Javed Syed, Lupe Valdez, Jim Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Arnone v. Syed et al
as 4:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Arnone
Defendant:
Javed Syed, Lupe Valdez, Jim Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marshall v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01642
Petitioner:
Romarcus Deon Marshall
Defendant:
Kyle B. Johnson, Wayne T. Hill, Claire Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03217
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Hill
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2012cv01681
Plaintiff:
Jerome Harrell
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethany v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2012cv01906
Plaintiff:
Wilton Bethany
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2012cv01908
Plaintiff:
Merrill Parker
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston, Diana Kukua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
