Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ray v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2018hc02252
Petitioner:
Ronnie T. Ray
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lollis v. Wells et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Petitioner:
Darryl Brandon Lollis
Defendant:
J.R. Wells, T. Ray and H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis v. Barber et al
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Darryl Brandon Lollis
Defendant:
Barber, D. Michalek, Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Poarch et al
as 2:2017cv00552
Plaintiff:
Hector Escalante Vazquez
Defendant:
T. Poarch and T. Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagwood v. Clarke et al
as 3:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
Amous Hagwood
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson, T. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Wall v. James Wade
as 13-6355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WADE, Food Services Manager, ROSP, ROBERT ROWLETTE, Assistant Warden of ROSP, T. RAY, Warden of ROSP and others
Defendant:
CAPTAIN K. MCCOY, Employee of ROSP, SERGEANT C. GILBERT, Employee of ROSP, SERGEANT T. ADAMS, Investigator of ROSP and others
Douglas v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00238
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, John Garman, Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Wade et al
as 7:2011cv00191
Defendant:
Sergeant T. Adams, Corporal Barrowman, K. Crowder-Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00185
Defendant:
K. Austin, Sgt. Baily, Mrs. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottrell v. Jabe et al
as 7:2010cv00505
Defendant:
Investigator T. Adams, Lt. J. Artrip, Sgt. L. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
