Cases 1 - 10 of 35
(PC) Garcia v. Denberg et al
as 2:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
William Garcia and William Patrick Garcia
Defendant:
B Denberg, D. Cueva, C. Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky T. Russell v. Nathan Townsend et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Ricky T. Russell
Defendant:
Nathan Townsend, Niutron, Correctional Officer Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky T. Russell v. Nathan Townsend et al
as 5:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Ricky T. Russell
Defendant:
Nathan Townsend, M. Houston, Morris, -- and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Godwin et al
as 3:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Dusty L Bowman
Defendant:
Warden John Godwin, Lt. T Teems, Sgt. D McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. McClellan et al
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
L McCollough, F.S.P. West Unit Mental Health Dept., G Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweeney v. Woodward et al
as 2:2019cv00125
Respondent:
Officer S. Bowman, Stephanie Woodward, Mollie M. Anderson and others
Petitioner:
Terence Joseph Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Russell v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2018cv01182
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Steven T. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Penoyer v. James Russell, et al
as 18-12184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. PENOYER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES T. RUSSELL, Prosecuter, B. J. DRIVER, Circuit Judge, JOSEPH DONAHEY, Attorney and others
Penoyer v. Russell et al
as 8:2018cv01008
Plaintiff:
Allen Lloyd Penoyer
Defendant:
James T. Russell, B. J. Driver, Joseph Donahey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cramer v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01700
Plaintiff:
James A. Cramer
Defendant:
Laurie Smith, S. Kernan, C. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
