Cases 11 - 20 of 28
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7849
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7846
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, J. ELY, D. BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Baker et al
as 7:2019cv00711
Defendant:
A. Rivero, J. Hounshell, A. Vanhuss and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00558
Defendant:
AW Anderson, Prison Guard Cox, AW Combs and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00496
Defendant:
W. Harber, W. Swiney, C. Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Smith et al
as 7:2019cv00420
Defendant:
VDOC, Carl A. Manis, The VDOC Health Services Director and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Robert Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Maj. Anderson, T. N. Bailey, C/O Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Robert Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, as amended and restated on January 1, 2014 et al
as 4:2018cv11518
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Townsend
Defendant:
Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, as amended and restated on January 1, 2014 and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Townsend v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Townsend
Defendant:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Assignment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
