Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Brantley v. Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) et al
as 5:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Steven Brantley, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), Dina Schievelbein, Wallace Tarver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brantley v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Diamond Brantley
Defendant:
Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. and Frankie Lane Tarver, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Tarver v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01616
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bastien v. Carruthers et al
as 5:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Abraham Bastien, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Carruthers, Wallace P. Tarver, Jr., Courtroom 399 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarver v. City of Denton, Texas et al
as 4:2021cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tarver
Defendant:
City of Denton, John Does 1-4, City of Denton, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarver v. Sai Shraddha, LLC, d/b/a Super 8 Motel et al
as 7:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tarver
Defendant:
Sai Shraddha, LLC, d/b/a Super 8 Motel and Alan Herig
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCoy v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Joanie Fontenot, Jared O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Boyce
as 1:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Dynette Johnson, Lori Walker, Deshelle Boyce and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Delone et al
as 1:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Lori Walker, Emma Davis, Rachel Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
