Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Tate v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03922
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Tate
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Andy Williams, Jr. v. City of Aurora, Illinois, et al
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS, MAYOR RICHARD IRVIN AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF AURORA, KRISTEN ZIMAN and others
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Rasheem Jackson
Defendant:
. Gomez, . Tate, . Stellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Tate et al
as 3:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres
Defendant:
Levencia Tate and Noah Beltramea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tate v. LOREAL USA Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Audrey Tate
Defendant:
LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tate v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tate
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Larry Cox
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv16421
Plaintiff:
Laurie Tate
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Tate v. Jones
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Germarco Tate
Defendant:
Nick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
