Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Tatum v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Tatum
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blackburn v. McPhail et al
as 5:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
DeCharla Danielle Blackburn
Defendant:
Kent D McPhail, Jason A Tatum, Jeffrey Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackburn v. Alavest LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
DeCharla Danielle Blackburn
Defendant:
Alavest LLC, Jay Tatum, Kent McPhail & Associates LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Tatum
as 2:2022mc03959
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Oscar Tatum
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3613
Tatum et al v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Sharri Tatum, Carrie Weimerskirch and Yvonne Brister
Defendant:
Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. Jasper Water Works and Sewer Board Inc et al
as 6:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Diana Smith, Jasper Water Works and Sewer Board Inc, Jason Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Tatum, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Regions Bank v. Ruby Tuesday Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant:
J Russell Mothershed, Paul Zimmerman, James Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Tatum v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00694
Plaintiff:
Antonio Oscar Tatum
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tatum v. Montgomery County et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00241
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Montgomery County Sheriff Department, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Oscar Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
