Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tatum v. DBOSS FUNDING LLC
as 6:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Justin Tatum
Defendant:
DBOSS FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04025
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Express, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
Kraig Tatum
Defendant:
Ranger Express, LLC and Tom Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tatum v. United Advisors LLC
as 6:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Justin Tatum
Defendant:
United Advisors LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tatum v. Parrish et al
as 4:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
Steven Tatum
Defendant:
Officer Parrish, Judge Don Strickland and Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Tatum, II
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Flores v. JPS Health Network et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dillon Flores
Defendant:
JPS Health Network, Dr. Shaw, Dr. Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. John Peter Smith Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Hospital, FNU Shaw, All Nurse Practicioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Garrido et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Warden FNU Garrido, FNU Swan, FNU McMannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
