Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Thayer v. Howard et al
as 5:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
David W. Thayer
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Lindsey Dinkel, Christine Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Szewc et al
as 5:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Kodi Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Lily Szewc, Njeri Mwangi, Mark Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
Terrica Taylor
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor (ID 40516) v. Easley
as 5:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Taylor
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Colburn et al
as 5:2023cv03155
Plaintiff:
Cameron Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Colburn and Ricklin Pierce
Interested Party:
Finney County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nickens v. Landers McLarty Olathe KS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Nickens
Defendant:
Landers McLarty Olathe KS, LLC doing business as Olathe Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram and Edward Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Taylor v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All Filings to be Made in Case 21-CR-10020-JWB Only***
as 6:2023cv01030
Petitioner:
Michael J. Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
