Cases 21 - 30 of 1,646
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
TOLON et al v. BGC 135 9TH STREET INC.
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
CHEYENNE TOLON and TAYLOR MYERS
Defendant:
BGC 135 9th STREET INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Taylor v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
ANGIE TAYLOR
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRISON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD HARRISON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON, KURT SUESSER, PAUL BROCKLEHURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FIDELITY LIFE ASSOCIATION v. TAYLOR-MCKULA et al
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY LIFE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ASHTON LEA TAYLOR-MCKULA, AMANDA LYNN MCKULA, M.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Roche v. SCI-Mahanoy RHU et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Roche
Defendant:
SCI-Mahanoy RHU, Department of Correction Facility, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dann v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Taylor Dann
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TAYLOR v. PIPIK et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
TERRELL TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSHUA PIPIK, DAVID FLAHTERNY, EBONY MARCELLE-RUDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
