Cases 21 - 30 of 10,768
Hoffman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40220
Plaintiff:
Fred Hoffman, III
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 24-40210
Petitioner:
Bakari Abdul Brown
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ponce v. Lumpkin
as 24-20134
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ponce
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Collier
as 24-50229
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director of Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Puente v. Lumpkin
as 24-40190
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Puente
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40193
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Busby v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40186
Petitioner:
Jose Garduno Guzman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10244
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10250
Petitioner:
Darrell Boyd Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
