Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hudson v. Attorney General for the State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv02799
Plaintiff:
Jose Montrell Hudson
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. Attorney General for the State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
Jose Montrell Hudson
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, The and Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minnesota Multi Housing Association et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2021cv01399
Plaintiff:
Guardian Property Management, Eagle Creek Townhomes-TK, LLC, Minnesota Multi Housing Association and others
Defendant:
Tim Walz, in his individual and official capacity as Governor of the State of Minnesota, John Doe, Keith Ellison, in his individual and official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE, Inc. et al
as 0:2020mc00067
Defendant:
Lucas Thomas ERB, TMTE, Inc., Luke Asher and others
Plaintiff:
State of Florida, Office of Financial Regulation, South Dakota Department of Labor & Regulation and others
Conley v. Smith et al
as 0:2013cv01069
Petitioner:
Daniel Lynn Conley
Respondent:
Michelle Smith and Attorney General of the state of Minnesota, The
Barnes v. Hammer et al
as 0:2012cv02745
Petitioner:
Danny Kwami Barnes
Respondent:
Steve Hammer and Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
Silverpony v. Goodno et al
as 0:2007cv04558
Petitioner:
Nevada Silverpony
Respondent:
Kevin Goodno and Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
