Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Janoch v. Medical Mutual of Ohio et al.
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lucia S. Janoch
Defendant:
Medical Mutual of Ohio, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Rawlings Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 23-7905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant / Appellee:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 23-1150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant / Appellee:
Lenox Hill Hospital, Dana A. Mannor, M.D., New York State Unified Court System and others
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 23-289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant / Appellee:
Lenox Hill Hospital, Dana A. Mannor, M.D., New York State Unified Court System and others
Fertil v. The Rawlings Company LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60328
Plaintiff:
Bertha Fertil
Defendant:
The Rawlings Company LLC and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 22-1723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant / Appellee:
Lenox Hill Hospital, Dana A. Mannor, M.D., New York State Unified Court System and others
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 22-1541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant / Appellee:
Dana A. Mannor, M.D., Lenox Hill Hospital, New York State Unified Court System and others
ROCHE v. AETNA INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ROCHE
Defendant:
AETNA INC., AETNA HEALTH INC. (A NJ CORP.), AETNA HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
