Cases 1 - 10 of 625
CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05642
Plaintiff:
DAMON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawn Keefer, et al v. President United States of America, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
DAWN KEEFER and TIMOTHY BONNER
Defendant:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
CHARSAR v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Ryan Matthew Charsar
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, STEVEN DETTELBACH, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv04439
Plaintiff:
JAMOR DEMBY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudwell et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Malika Hudwell, Ikeem Adams, Malika Hudwell on behalf of minor children Z.H.T. and N.H.A. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Livia Scotto v. Commission, et al
as 24-1418
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
THE COMMISSION, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS and others
Nicholas Martino v. USA
as 24-1404
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS K. MARTINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Calzone v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Vincent Paul Calzone
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Steven Dettelbach, Christopher A. Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
