Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Maxton v. Trump et al
as 5:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, U.S. Attorney General, BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Maxton v. United States, et al
as 16-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERON JOHNNY MAXTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOP DIRECTOR, WASHINGTON, D.C., T.K. COZZA-RHODES, Warden, F.C.I. and others
Maxton v. Black et al
as 1:2013cv01894
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
Lisa Black, Naren Masser and P. Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maxton v. United States
as 1:2013cv01893
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maxton v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv01792
Petitioner:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Respondent:
J. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maxten v. Pigos et al
as 1:2013cv01213
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
Kevin Pigos, Fasciana Francis, F. Alama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maxton v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, Eric Holder, Charles Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maxton v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, F. Entzel and Charles Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maxton v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2013cv00244
Petitioner:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Respondent:
TH Tozza Rhodes and Charles Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
