Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe #1 et al v. United States et al
as 1:2019at00154
Defendant:
Bureau of A.T.F. & E, FBI Christopher Wray, United States and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, Jane Roe #1, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe #1 et al v. United States et al
as 1:2019cv00270
Defendant:
Bureau of A.T.F. & E, United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, Jane Roe #1, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REYES v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01643
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and THOMAS BRANDON
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. REYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Daniel Daogaru v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 16-15722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAOGARU
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and THOMAS BRANDON
Daniel Daogaru v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 16-15722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAOGARU
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and THOMAS BRANDON
Corcoran v. Lynch et al
as 8:2016cv01813
Plaintiff:
Thomas Corcoran
Defendant:
Loretta E. Lynch, Thomas Brandon, Brian E. Frosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Corcoran v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv01813
Plaintiff:
Thomas Corcoran
Defendant:
Loretta E. Lynch, Thomas Brandon, Brian E. Frosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daogaru v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv00922
Defendant:
Lynch, Loretta Lynch and Thomas Brandon
Plaintiff:
Daogaru and Daniel Daogaru
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922 Unlawful Acts - Prohibition To Carry Firearm
COMMON PURPOSE USA, INC. v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
COMMON PURPOSE USA, INC.
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, LORETTA E. LYNCH, VANITA GUPTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
