Cases 1 - 10 of 13
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv02960
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CURTIS LOVE, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84733
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CURTIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Cenlar, FSB et al
as 9:2019cv80455
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curtis
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc., Cenlar, FSB, Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc. doing business as Nationstar Mortgage and others
Thomas Hines v. Justice Shaw, et al
as 17-10431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CURTIS HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTICE SHAW, Ala Supreme Court - Court of Criminal Appeal, JUSTICE WISE, Ala Supreme Court - Court of Criminal Appeal, JUSTICE MAIN, Ala Supreme Court - Court of Criminal Appeal and others
Thomas Hines v. Kim Thomas, et al
as 16-16256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CURTIS HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM THOMAS, WARDEN, CYNTHIA A. WHITE and others
Hines v. Wise et al
as 1:2016cv00461
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curtis Hines
Defendant:
Justice Wise, Justice Shaw, Justice Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Hines v. Kim Thomas, et al
as 13-14184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CURTIS HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM THOMAS, JAMES DELOACH, CYNTHIA WHITE and others
Kimberly Curtis, et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC
as 13-11191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY CURTIS and THOMAS CURTIS, Husband and Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Thomas Hines v. Cynthia White
as 12-13732
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS CURTIS HINES
Respondent - Appellee:
CYNTHIA WHITE
Hines v. Johnson
as 1:2011cv00648
Petitioner:
Thomas Curtis Hines
Respondent:
Willie E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
