Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SHELTON v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
CHERON SHELTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, COLEMAN MCDONOUGH, SCOTT SCHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, COLEMAN MCDONOUGH, SCOTT SCHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOLEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10931
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FOLEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEELEN V BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG
as 3:2017cv04521
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. KEELEN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG , RAYMOND O'HARE , JAMES K. PIGOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOONER et al v. HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2017cv01635
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOONER , FREDERICK R. SHELLHAMMER, III , THOMAS FOLEY and others
Defendant:
HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COOKE v. BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG et al
as 3:2014cv06798
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN COOKE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEANSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT STREET CRIMES UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOLEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66441
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FOLEY
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Billy Smith v. USA, et al
as 10-2025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY RAY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS F. HOGAN, PATRICK J. ATTRIDGE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN GIDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
