Cases 1 - 10 of 24
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 3:2023cv21264
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE, CHRISTOPHER SQUAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Gage v. Keith Lynch, et al
as 23-1168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. LYNCH, construction official and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 1:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE, CHRISTOPHER SQUAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GAGE
as 3:2021cv13180
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
THOMAS I GAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 3:2021cv10763
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and JOHN K. RUSCHKE, PE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGE v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2020cv16236
Defendant:
KEITH J. LYNCH and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv09098
Defendant:
MARGARET GOODZEIT, LAW OFFICE OF RAJAN PATEL, OWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv01226
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY COURTS ADMINISTRATION, MICHELLE M. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gage v. Patel
as 1:2017cv08256
Plaintiff:
Thomas I. Gage
Defendant:
Rajan Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
