Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Strasser v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 1:2017cv01873
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Strasser
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee , Eric Ratzmann , Ray Bogust and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Thomas Johnson
as 16-16679
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson et al v. Espar Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03174
Defendant:
Espar Inc. and Espar Products Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson and Jim Steger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE ESPAR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc00940
Defendant:
John E. Bishop, Espar Inc., Espar North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Davidson Transfer, LLC, Guay Brothers Company, Inc., Thomas Johnson and others
In Re:
IN RE ESPAR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2015mc00258
Defendant:
1-10 Correction Officer, Superintendent H. Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Gerard Morrison v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 14-2308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY CRAWFORD, BRADFORD COCHRANE, JR., ROBERT LISON and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DIZE
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VA
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-16341
Plaintiff:
Linda Johnson and Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc.
Sebastian Richardson v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 13-8046
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SEBASTIAN RICHARDSON
Defendant - Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE, JOSEPH NORWOOD, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
Quinn v. Wilmington Health PLLC et al
as 7:2013cv00047
Defendant:
Wilmington Health PLLC, Thomas Johnson Beckett, Kristi Barger Simms, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
