Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Joseph Griffith v. Thomas Maher
as 20-7342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS K. MAHER
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Maher
as 5:2019ct03053
Defendant:
Thomas K. Maher
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Pollard et al
as 5:2018ct03310
Defendant:
Thomas K. Maher and Mary Pollard
Plaintiff:
Gregory Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORSO v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2018cv00669
Defendant:
OFFICER WALL, OFFICER TORENCE, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY and others
Plaintiff:
LELAND CORSO
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Taylor v. Maher et al
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eddie Levord Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas K. Maher, Martha Curran, Kevin P. Tolly and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Boner et al
as 3:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Eddie Levord Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Boner, Reginal Miller, Robert Bell and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Hall et al
as 5:2013ct03231
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Simpson, II
Defendant:
Willard Hall, Director of Prisons, Mary Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc et al
as 5:2013ct03158
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc, Mary Pollard, Staff Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
