Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WATERMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23896
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WATERMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyson v Waterman et al
as 4:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas Waterman and Darrel Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cyrus Sarvestaney v. Catholic Health Association of the United States, et al
as 22-1959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYRUS SARVESTANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHOLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES, THOMAS WATERMAN, DOUGLAS CROPPER and others
Sarvestaney v. Catholic Health Association of the United States et al
as 4:2022cv04064
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Sarvestaney
Defendant:
Catholic Health Association of the United States, Thomas Waterman, Douglas Cropper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richards v. Kinkade et al
as 4:2020cv00311
Defendant:
Jonah Dyer, Bradley Barrett Kinkade, Bret Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 4:2019cv04214
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Stephanie "the Hulk Rose, Brent Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant and Kenneth Tennant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Abraham et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11515
Plaintiff:
John Zimmerman, Daniel Jankowski, Alex Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Waterman v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv06254
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waterman
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
