Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01706
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hasbrouck et al v. Yavapai, County of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv08112
Defendant: David Williams, Carlton Woodruff, Larry Jacobs and others
Plaintiff: Donna M Hasbrouck and Earl M Hasbrouck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Maricopa County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00442
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Jail and Joseph Arpaio
Plaintiff: Anthony Tyrone Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02902
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Karen Thurman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thurman et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02774
Plaintiff: Rickey C Thurman and Sharon Thurman
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08182
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thurman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02565
Plaintiff: Shirley A Thurman
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thurman v. Professional Account Services Incorporated
as 2:2014cv01725
Plaintiff: Kenneth Thurman
Defendant: Professional Account Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bell v. Thurman
as 2:2014cv01297
Petitioner: Kelly R Bell
Respondent: James Edward Thurman, Jr.
Intervenor: Arizona Department of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?