Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Douglas Zolnierz v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 12-16974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS JOHN ZOLNIERZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, FULTON BROCK, DON STAPLEY and others
Booth v. Inmate Legal Services et al
as 2:2012cv00982
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B B Booth
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services, Joseph M Arpaio and Timothy Overton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riess v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Riess
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Eastlund, Unknown Wiscombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bobby Woods Craig, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jerrod Booth v. Joe Arpaio, et al
as 09-15793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, Maricpa County Sheriff, TIMOTHY OVERTON, Jail Commander at 4th Ave. Jail, JOHN DOE, Legal Support Specialist and others
Jerrod Booth v. Maricopa County, et al
as 09-15794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff, TIMOTHY OVERTON, Jail Commander and others
Jerrod Booth v. Inmate Legal Services, et al
as 09-15787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH, AKA Jerrod Booth
Defendant - Appellee:
INMATE LEGAL SERVICES, JOE ARPAIO, TIMOTHY OVERTON and others
Rogers v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv00745
Plaintiff:
Carl David Rogers
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Kucera and Timothy Overton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Inmate Legal Services, et al
as 2:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services, Joe Arpaio, Timothy Overton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
