Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Bywater #320790 v. Hudson et al
as 1:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Bywater #320790
Defendant:
Mark Hudson and Joe Borczak, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mosley et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv10470
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., Darryl Jones, Cadillac Hotel Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Khari Mosley and Chelsa Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corey et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11102
Plaintiff:
Iesha Corey , E. T. , Eric Tanner and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder, Flint, City of , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Troy Tile & Stone, Inc. v. R. E. West, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11526
Plaintiff:
Troy Tile & Stone, Inc.
Defendant:
R. E. West, Inc. and Timothy Scott Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bywater v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01001
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Bywater
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv14730
Plaintiff:
Frances Scott , Cassandra Cleveland and Timothy Scott
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Etherton v. Rivard
as 2:2011cv11958
Petitioner:
Timothy Scott Etherton
Respondent:
Steven Rivard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera #220321 v. Wooten
as 1:2011cv00387
Plaintiff:
Marco Rivera #220321
Defendant:
Timothy Scott Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
