Cases 1 - 10 of 24
In Re: Christopher John Tindall
as 5:2024mc00009
Unknown:
Christopher John Tindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Tindall et al
as 2:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas A Tindall and Siskiyou County
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
Rebekah Seal et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04996
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Seal, Joanne Senat, Arturo Senti and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 4:2021cv03820
Plaintiff:
Earl Davis
Defendant:
Dillon Tindall and City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pumphrey v. Harvey et al
as 3:2020cv08474
Defendant:
Colton Harvey, Jesus Arellano, DOES 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Pumphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavender v. Nevada County et al
as 2:2019cv01050
Defendant:
Shannon Malloy, Nevada County, California, Keith Royal and others
Plaintiff:
Sonya Cheyenne Cavender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland et al v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2019cv02545
Defendant:
Watson #2481, Petersen #2092, Eric Tindall #2030 and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Nelson and Paul Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2018cv02689
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Department, Rector, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tindall v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Tindall
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolzen et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Janet Wolzen , Linda Godfrey , Teresa Navarro and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
