Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Charles Hinton v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6789
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of Prison, North Carolina Department of Corrections and EDWARD F. BASDEN, Superintendent, Pender Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Pierre Amerson v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6728
Respondent:
TIMOTHY D. MOOSE, Chief Deputy Secretary and TODD E. ISHEE, Director
Petitioner:
PIERRE ALEXANDER AMERSON
BREWER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BREWER
Defendant:
C. MCBRIDE, HENRY S. NORDAN, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024hc02134
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Warden Michael T. Persons and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spates v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03172
Defendant:
Pete Buchholtz and Todd E. Ishee
Plaintiff:
Andre Michael Spates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine
as 24-6649
Defendant:
CAROL MILLIGAN, CHERYL BUSHMELL, JASON REID, Ex Deputy and others
Plaintiff:
A.D.R., A.M.R. and CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 5:2024hc02124
Respondent:
ViaPath Technologies, Todd E. Ishee and Global Tellink Corporation
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Defendant:
CONNIE LOCKLEAR JONES, Doctor, PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, Grievance Processer, CYNTHIA LOWERY, Green Unit Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Todd E Ishee, Global Tel Link Corporation and ViaPath Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
