Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. v. Tennessee Regulatory Authority We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00679
Petitioner: Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Respondent: Tennessee Regulatory Authority
Intervenor: Concord Telephone Exchange, Inc. , Humphreys County Telephone Company , Tellico Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
Transcom Enhanced Svcs. Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 11-9594
Petitioner: TRANSCOM ENHANCED SERVICES, INC.
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Transcom Enhanced Services Inc v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
as 3:2011cv03454
Plaintiff: Transcom Enhanced Services Inc
Defendant: Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Transcom Enhanced Svcs, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 11-1476
Petitioner: Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Concord Telephone Exchange, Inc. et al v. Halo Wireless, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00796
Plaintiff: Concord Telephone Exchange, Inc. , Humphreys County Telephone Company , Tellico Telephone Company and others
Defendant: Halo Wireless, Inc. and Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
TDS Telecom et al v. Halo Wireless, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02749
Plaintiff: TDS Telecom , Blue Ridge Telephone Company , Camden Telephone & Telegraph Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Halo Wireless, Inc. and Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Movant: BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC
Intervenor_plaintiff: Georgia Public Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Transcom Enhanced Services Inc v. AT&T Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00311
Plaintiff: Transcom Enhanced Services Inc
Defendant: AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?