Cases 1 - 10 of 19
NOTASH et al v. TOTAL MILITARY MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00890
Defendant:
FAYETTEVILLE MOVING & STORAGE, INC., TOTAL MILITARY MANAGEMENT, INC., A-WORLD MOVING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID NOTASH and KELLY HAMLIN
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Interstate Freight Claim (Carmack Amendment)
LCG Freight, Inc. v. A.R.C. Transit, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
LCG Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
A.R.C. Transit, LLC and E.F. Corporation doing business as West Motor Freight of Pa.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Red Classic Equipment LLC et al v. Hartley et al
as 6:2022cv03857
Plaintiff:
Red Classic Equipment LLC and Red Classic Transit LLC
Defendant:
Jerry Hartley and Brooks Dehart Furniture Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pickens v. Red Classic Transit LLC
as 6:2021cv02811
Plaintiff:
Frank Pickens, Jr
Defendant:
Red Classic Transit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guy v. Red Classic Transit, LLC
as 5:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Guy
Defendant:
Red Classic Transit, LLC and A. Keith Whitman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Guy v. Whitman et al
as 5:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Guy
Defendant:
Keith A. Whitman and Red Classic Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Practice Transitions, LLC v. Thompson
as 3:2019cv00358
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL PRACTICE TRANSITIONS, LLC
Defendant:
Amanda Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
