Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Bolyard v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tanya Rose Bolyard
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC , Autoliv ASP, Inc. , TRW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layton v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kay Layton
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, J & J Ford Sales, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
McZeke v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 4:2009cv02663
Plaintiff:
Marvin McZeke
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Horace McZeke and Horace McZeke
Cross Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Marvin McZeke v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 4:2008cv02981
Plaintiff:
Marvin McZeke
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Horace McZeke, Horace McZeke, Ford Motor Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Horace McZeke and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ESTATE OF ALEXANDER DAVID SETTLE et al v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00727
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ALEXANDER DAVID SETTLE and M. SCOTT SETTLE
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF AMERICA, INC., MITSUBISHI MOTORS R&D OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Williams et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2007cv03184
Plaintiff:
Exzerra Williams, Exzerra Williams, Cedric Williams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
