Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Prasad v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Hamilton L. Hendrix, Gloria D. Lewis-Sorrell, James Sorrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck v. Stanbeck et al
as 3:2014cv00830
Plaintiff:
William James Tuck, III
Defendant:
Stanbeck, Simmons, Protray Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck v. Temple
as 3:2014cv00814
Plaintiff:
William James Tuck, III
Defendant:
Protray Temple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2014cv00701
Plaintiff:
Terry Tuck
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Alvarez et al v. ReadyClean Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00490
Plaintiff:
Leonila Delao Alvarez , Carlos Aparicio Araniva , Rafaela Morales Chavez and others
Defendant:
ReadyClean Industrial Services, Inc. , Beacon Facilities Management, LLC , Michael Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Atkins v. Henrico County Jail et al
as 1:2013cv00962
Plaintiff:
Lance Dominique Atkins
Defendant:
Henrico County Jail, Henrico County Sheriff'S Office, Michael Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron-Bennett et al v. McCandless et al
as 1:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Luz Denise Negron-Bennett and Salim A. Bennett
Defendant:
Jason Lee McCandless, Arlington County Office of the County Attorney, Arlington County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sprinkle v. Ali et al
as 7:2013cv00022
Defendant:
Ali, Lindsay Buschar and Tuck
Plaintiff:
David Frank Sprinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00516
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
