Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tucker v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00552
Petitioner:
Carlos Antonio Tucker
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2023cv03206
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tucker
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Tucker v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 7:2022cv05000
Plaintiff:
Robert Adam Tucker
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Tucker v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00475
Petitioner:
Kevin Tucker
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tucker v. Berryhill
as 8:2017cv00355
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rhonda L. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2017mc03026
Defendant:
AMG Capital Management, LLC, AMG Services, Inc., Black Creek Capital Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Thomas McNamera
Tucker v. Nelnet, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00444
Defendant:
Nelnet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Seth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Tucker v. USA
as 8:2016cv00302
Petitioner:
Alfred Tucker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
