Cases 1 - 10 of 13
LAWSON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
TYREE LAWSON
Respondent:
GEORGE LITTLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWSON v. SCI PHOENIX'S GINA CLARK et al
as 2:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, MANDY BISER SIPPLE, PAMELA SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04973
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
SECRETRAY JOHN WETZEL, KELLY LONG, MELLISSA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04568
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER MOSTILLER Badge No. 5935, DETECTIVE KUCHINSKY Badge No. 904 and others
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAWSON v. DELLIPONTE
as 2:2019cv02432
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
LAURA BANTA and MELISSA DELLIPONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. LUQUIS et al
as 2:2019cv02434
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
LAURA BANTA, JAIME LUQUIS, GINA CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. BANTA et al
as 2:2018cv03670
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
KELLY LONG, BANTA and SCI PHOENIX'S ENTIRE MAILROOM UNKNOWN PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2014cv01399
Petitioner:
TYREE LAWSON
Respondent:
M. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2014cv00135
Petitioner:
TYREE LAWSON
Respondent:
M. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2011cv04687
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM R. CARPENTER, JENNIFER A GILLESPIE and CHANEL R PYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
