Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19529
Plaintiff:
TYRONE PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERSON v. WARDEN DAVID BYRNE et al
as 2:2020cv00091
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID BYRNE, NURSING DIRECTOR MARIEL TRIMBLE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RASHEED and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Interbay Funding LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Interbay Funding LLC and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Peterson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aepelbacher et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12030
Plaintiff:
Rory Walsh, Brian Hilderbrand, Marianne Fabozzi and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
PETERSON v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01626
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
TYRONE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Johnson
as 0:2016cv62002
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Peterson
Defendant:
R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant et al v. Imperatrice et al
as 1:2016cv01449
Plaintiff:
Lamont Grant , Torrell Grant , Tyrone Peterson and others
Defendant:
Joseph Imperatrice, Spencer Garrett, Jonathan Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00666
Petitioner:
Tyrone Peterson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00349
Petitioner:
Tyrone Peterson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
