Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Roberto Talamantez v. Steve Smith
as 2:2023cv08468
Petitioner:
Roberto Talamantez
Respondent:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Talamantez v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03493
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Otto Talamantez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Safety Management and Related Training, Inc. v. CNA Surety et al
as 3:2018cv02054
Defendant:
Randall Anderson, Does 1 through 20, Atala ECR, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Safety Management and Related Training, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of:
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Miguel Correra-Marquez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71741
Petitioner:
MIGUEL CORRERA-MARQUEZ, AKA Miguel Correra, AKA Miguel Correra-Talamantez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Gilbert Talamantez v. Credit One Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv00983
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A. and Does
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Talamantez
Talamantez v. Gastelo
as 1:2016cv01712
Petitioner:
Robert Talamantez
Respondent:
Josie Gastelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
M. (minor), et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al.
as 1:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
C. M. (minor) , I. M. (minor) and Ramona Talamantez
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate and James A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. (minor) et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2015at00903
Plaintiff:
C. M. (minor) , I. M. (minor) and Ramona Talamantez
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate and James A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
