Cases 1 - 10 of 81
PD v. Sampson et al
as 2:2024cv10894
Plaintiff:
P. D.
Defendant:
James Sampson, Tamara L. Spencer, Carolyn Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilcoxon v. Bernard et al
as 5:2022cv12779
Plaintiff:
D. Etta Wilcoxon
Defendant:
Linda Bernard, Willie Bell, Annie Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
James Hall v. Tammy O'Brien, et al
as 22-3663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE TAMMY O'BRIEN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE TAMARA J. TODD, JAMES R. SILVER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
