Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hall v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
Judge Tammy O'Brien, Magistrate Judge Tamara J. Todd, James R. Silver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steagall v. Whitney Woods Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steagall
Defendant:
Tom Jones, Donald J. Acquista, James Berutti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thigpen v. Davies et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Robert E. Lee Davies, William Acree, Don Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Garcia v. Concept Schools et al
as 3:2020cv00474
Defendant:
Horizon Science Academy-Dayton, Educational Service Center of Lake Erie West, Ranay Nunamaker and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swinson v. Tullahoma Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00207
Defendant:
Jacob Smith, City of Tullahoma, Tullahoma Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Tamara R. Swinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
