Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Filippova v. Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP et al
as 9:2018cv80126
Plaintiff:
Tamara Filippova
Defendant:
Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP , Ilia Mogilevsky and Natalia Mogilevsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North American Elite Insurance Company v. Fredericks et al
as 3:2017cv01428
Plaintiff:
North American Elite Insurance Company
Defendant:
Arthur Fredericks and Tamara Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamara Goines v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00511
Defendant:
DOES, JP Morgan Chase, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tamara Goines
McElroy v. McBarnet
as 1:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hale McElroy
Defendant:
Logan McBarnet, Terry T. McBarnet, Gary Heller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Anderson et al
as 5:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Tamara K. Anderson, Unknown Spouse of Tamara K. Anderson and Capital One Bank (USA), NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Quijano-Vazquez et al
as 3:2016cv02895
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Victor Manuel Quijano-Vazquez, Iris Tamara Martinez-Lopez and Conjugal Partnership Quijano-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
East Perimeter Pointe Apts. v. Bradley
as 1:2016cv03747
Plaintiff:
East Perimeter Pointe Apts.
Defendant:
Tamara Bradley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
National ERA Servicing v. James et al
as 1:2016cv01559
Plaintiff:
National ERA Servicing
Defendant:
William James, Jr. and Tamara Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
57th Saga, LLC v. Tamara D. White
as 2:2016cv03131
Plaintiff:
57th Saga, LLC
Defendant:
DOES and Tamara D. White
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hynes et al
as 6:2016cv00462
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Jeffrey M. Hynes, Tamara M. Hynes, Tallman's Sale & Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
