Cases 1 - 10 of 345
TAN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
JONAH TAN
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 AKA "Agatha Li" and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lovelace v. Xue et al
as 1:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pauline Abby Lovelace
Defendant:
Hang Xue, Bee Chu, Tan et al and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Tan v. Shein Distribution Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv20259
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tan
Defendant:
Shein Distribution Corp., Zoetop Business Co., Limited and Roadget Business PTE, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
TAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27202
Plaintiff:
KAH TAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23392
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY TAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09776
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LEE DAVID TAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. REID et al
as 4:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN LYNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
FRANK MADISON REID, TAN CLARENCE MOSS, FRANK MADISON REID, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saetane et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv14186
Plaintiff:
Tan Seng Saetane and Sarn Saetane
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vargas v. WellPath et al
as 0:2022cv61590
Plaintiff:
Carlos Xavier Vargas
Defendant:
WellPath, Broward Sheriff's Office, Gregory Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
