Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Yang v. Tan
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Lee Yang
Defendant:
Dr Egbert Tan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang v. Tan
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Lee Yang
Defendant:
Dr Egbert Tan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang v. Tan
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Lee Yang
Defendant:
Dr Tan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tran v. Acme Machell Company Inc
as 2:2021cv00925
Plaintiff:
Tan Tran
Defendant:
Acme Machell Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Law Tanning Co LLC v. Westfield Insurance Company et al
as 2:2017cv01703
Plaintiff:
Law Tanning Co LLC
Defendant:
Westfield Insurance Company and Randy Draeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wei et al v. Rocky Point International LLC
as 2:2016cv01282
Plaintiff:
Seah Chee Wei and Tan Suah Pin
Defendant:
Rocky Point International LLC
Third_party_plaintiff:
Treatmil Holdings, Ltd. AMS Asia Pacific, LTD and DAG Dvergsten
Third_party_defendant:
Treatmil Holdings, Ltd. AMS Asia Pacific, LTD and DAG Dvergsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lim v. Lim
as 2:2011cv00980
Petitioner:
Meow Chu Lim
Respondent:
Khor Chin Lim
Counter_defendant:
Hao Liang Chong, HSBC Holdings, Scott Walker and others
Counter_claimant:
Khor Chin Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Waste Management of Wisconsin Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00346
Defendant:
Arcelormittal Mortgage Acceptance Inc, Master Lock Company LLC, CNH America LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
