Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Taylor v. DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tania Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Eastin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Tania Eastin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Welch et al v. Ashtabula County Children Services Board et al
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Amber Welch and R. W.
Defendant:
Ashtabula County Children Services Board, Angela Lawton and Tania Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Allen v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02199
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Tania Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Claribel Diaz-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3333
Petitioner:
CLARIBEL DEL ROSARIO DIAZ-HERNANDEZ, TANIA PRISCILA MELARA-DIAZ and NANCY IVETH MELARA-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
