Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mathiesen v. Black Hills Special Services Cooperative et al
as 5:2023cv05080
Plaintiff:
Julie Mathiesen
Defendant:
Black Hills Special Services Cooperative, Members of the Black Hills Special Services Board of Directors, Katie Birchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Svendsen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Tanya Svendsen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tieszen v. Bastian et al
as 5:2021cv05034
Defendant:
Dan Friedel, Judge John Bastian, Fred Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Tieszen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuck v. Milbrandt et al
as 1:2018cv01014
Plaintiff:
Scott T. Kuck
Defendant:
Mark Milbrandt , Brown County Sheriff's Office , Brown County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montileaux v. Berg et al
as 3:2017cv03015
Plaintiff:
Miriam Chantel Montileaux
Defendant:
Darren Berg, William Schied, Nelda Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montileaux v. Berg et al
as 3:2017cv03013
Plaintiff:
Miriam C. Montileaux
Defendant:
Darren Berg, William Schied, Darin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montileaux v. Hyde et al
as 3:2016cv03014
Plaintiff:
Miriam C. Montileaux
Defendant:
Jon Degreef, Scott Mees, William Schied and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pease v. Hyde et al
as 3:2013cv03003
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Pease
Defendant:
Brenda Hyde, Danny Kaemingk, Tanya Reiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tieszen v. Bastian et al
as 5:2011cv05053
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Tieszen
Defendant:
John Bastian, John Hunter, Don Friedel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
