Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cluck v. Teague Ranch Company, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Katsy Mullendore Mecom Cluck
Defendant:
Teague Ranch Company, LLC and Te Teague Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Teague v. Stephens County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Teague
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center, Javier Martinez and FNU Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teague v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Teague
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Teague v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Kitty Teague
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Teague v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv00762
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ann Teague
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Teague v. Crow et al
as 5:2020cv00441
Respondent:
Director DOC Scott Crow, Jimmy Martin, Mike Hunter and others
Petitioner:
Herman Teague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teague v. Crow et al
as 4:2020cv00170
Plaintiff:
Herman Teague
Defendant:
Jimmy Martin, Mike Hunter, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teague et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 6:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Teague and Madeline Ann Teague
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carmichael v. Teague et al
as 5:2018cv01248
Defendant:
Irby Construction Company and Bradley Teague
Plaintiff:
Tammy Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carlton v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Andre M Carlton
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, Josh Gershon and Travis Teague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
