Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. v. TCL Corporation et al
as 8:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Defendant:
TCL Corporation, TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, TCT Mobile US Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc and ZTE (TX) Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Counter Claimant:
TCT Mobile (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01366
Consolidated Defendant:
Wistron InfoComm Technology (America) Corp., TPV Electronics (Fujian) Co. Ltd., Wistron InfoComm Technology (Texas) Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Personalized Media Communications, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom, Edward A Infante and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Phenix, LLC v. Integrated Memory Logic, Ltd. et al
as 6:2015cv00436
Not Classified By Court:
Jeff Kaplan and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
Phenix, LLC
Defendant:
Integrated Memory Logic, Ltd., Exar Corporation and Integrated Memory Logic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Intuitive Building Controls, Inc. v. AMX LLC
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Intuitive Building Controls, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Acuity Brands, Inc. and Control4 Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Gary V McGowan, David Folsom and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Crestron Electronics, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
WI-Lan, Inc.
Defendant:
AMX LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DataQuill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co LTD et al
as 2:2013cv00633
Not Classified By Court:
Jeff Kaplan, Hesha Abrams and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
DataQuill Limited
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies Co LTD, Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
Intervenor:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Kellan Restaurant Management Corp. d/b/a 54th Street Grill & Bar
as 2:2012cv00761
Not Classified By Court:
James W. Knowles and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Kellan Restaurant Management Corp
Consolidated Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., Marco's Franchising, LLC and others
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant:
Struck, Inc.
Petitioner:
CHICK-FIL-A, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2012cv00878
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Grainger and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
Motion Games, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Rent-A-Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Nintendo of America, Inc., Retro Studios, Inc. and GameStop Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stambler v. Atmos Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv00594
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner, James W. Knowles, James W Knowles and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Stambler
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corp., Atmos Energy Services, LLC, Cinemark USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Patent Harbor, LLC v. Audiovox Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00361
Defendant:
Onkyo USA Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., DPI, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
James W Knowles, Hesha Abrams, Gary Kitchen and others
Plaintiff:
Patent Harbor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Franklin Inventions, LLC v. Election Systems & Software, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00377
Defendant:
Election Systems & Software Inc, Premier Election Solutions Inc, Hart InterCivic Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Inventions LLC
Petitioner:
UHY Advisors FLVS Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
